Trump’s Executive Actions on Immigration: A Dive into Legal Challenges and Practical Implications

Trump’s Enactment of Stringent Immigration Policies

In an unyielding display of commitment to his previous campaign promises, President Trump initiated a spate of executive actions aiming at curbing legal migration and deporting those in the U.S. illegally. Tightened border security, heightened deportation efforts, and an array of measures targeted at immigration form the crux of Trump’s freshly inaugurated second term.

Controversial Closure of Birthright Citizenship

Among the numerous executive actions, one that unequivocally stands out is the controversial decision to finish birthright citizenship. This long-held constitutional provision, embedded in the 14th Amendment, grants citizenship to those born on U.S. soil, irrespective of their parents’ legal status. The proposed narrowing of the interpretation of the Amendment, based on the parent’s legal status, is slated to encounter immediate legal objections.

Legal Hurdles for End Birthright Citizenship

Reinterpreting and changing the established constitutional provision is loaded with legal impediments and can be subjected to challenges in court. Exploiting the clause ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ as a loophole to place unprecedented restrictions on who can obtain U.S. citizenship will undoubtedly spur contentious debates in the legal sphere.

Declaring a National Emergency at the Southern Border

With the executive action to declare a national emergency at the southern border, the President is considering deploying armed forces and the National Guard to expedite the border wall construction. Trump’s portrayal of the southern border as overrun by cartels, illicit activities, and unauthorized crosses appears to be amplified, particularly when counterpoised with recent reports indicating a decline in unauthorized apprehensions.

Implications of Deploying Armed Forces

The proposed measure could potentially redefine the military’s role in maintaining border security. It is crucial to assess whether the deployment of armed forces might infringe upon the constitutionally defined jurisdictions of the military and whether it may foster legal or humanitarian issues that could be tied up in lengthy court battles.

Reviving ‘Remain in Mexico’ and Ending ‘Catch and Release’

Trump’s actions also aim to halt the policy known as ‘catch and release,’ which allowed individuals with pending immigration court hearings to be released from detention. Reinstating the ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy, asylum seekers at the southern border would be required to stay in Mexico while awaiting their hearing in the U.S. immigration court. While on paper this might seem like a good deterrent, the practical implication of such restrictive immigration measures can be much more complicated.

Potential Consequences of Restrictive Immigration Measures

These policies could breed a variety of problematic scenarios, including logistical bottlenecks at border crossings, humanitarian crises, and legal issues surrounding due process rights for asylum seekers. Moreover, the restriction on the ‘catch and release’ policy could lead to concerns about detention capacity and the ability to house a potentially large number of detainees.

Trump’s Decision to Reinstate the Death Penalty

Last but not least is the contentious move to restore the federal death penalty for certain crimes committed by individuals without legal status. This directive, made during Trump’s maiden term, unfolds a chapter in capital punishment, with President Biden even commuting sentences for inmates on federal death row during his time in office.

Considerations For Death Penalty Reinstitution

Reintroducing the death penalty warrants diligent attention to critical factors, such as constitutional considerations, potential for discriminatory application, and the seen divergence from global norms, which seem to trend toward abolishing the death penalty.

Legal and Practical Challenges Ahead

While the Trump administration may take weeks or even months to implement these new policies, it is almost certain that they will face a wave of legal challenges. The effects of this unprecedented action, both legal and practical, will unequivocally shape the discourse surrounding immigration and border security in the United States.

Originally Post From https://www.kjzz.org/politics/2025-01-20/trump-signs-sweeping-actions-on-immigration-and-border-security-on-day-1

Read more about this topic at
Fire in the belly: Obama’s 2015 State of the Union speech